Why both conditions matter
A concise symbol does not prove that a product contains only one economic exposure. Conversely, a record without an underlying-token list does not supply enough information to pass this particular filter. Requiring both fields makes the selection rule explicit. It still relies on the provider’s description and cannot establish everything a wrapper, vault or derivative does beneath the reported interface.
Single asset does not mean native staking
The results can represent different product mechanisms. A lending position, a vault and a staking-related wrapper should not all be described as staking merely because they each expose one reported token. Use the pool identifier and project name to investigate the actual mechanism. In a hypothetical comparison, two ETH-related entries with 4% and 6% reported APY could have different withdrawal processes, reward components and derivative-token dependencies.
Read the components and costs
The screen lets you order qualifying pools by TVL, total reported APY or available base APY while retaining the reward component. A larger headline can reflect temporary incentives, and missing components remain unknown. The filter does not verify withdrawals, remove contract risk or ensure the underlying token maintains its intended relationship to another asset. Use the general yield search to understand what this narrower rule excludes, then compare the current estimate with its reported 30-day mean where available. The quoted figures describe a provider snapshot rather than a fixed return or a completed deposit simulation.